Lsp

* **Code Quality:** The code demonstrates a basic understanding of Go's concurrency features but lacks robust error handling and comprehensive testing. The security score is alarmingly low, indicating significant vulnerabilities. * **Language Features:** Effective use of JSON marshaling/unmarshaling; however, inefficient error handling and missing Go's more advanced features (e.g., context for cancellation). * **Code Structure:** Modular structure with reasonable separation of concerns (RPC handling, LSP logic). However, file names and comments could be more descriptive and precise. * **Improvements:** Prioritize comprehensive unit and integration testing; address the critical security issues; improve error handling with more specific error messages and recovery mechanisms; enhance logging. Use `context.Context` for better cancellation control. **Bullet Points:** * Rudimentary LSP implementation; critical security flaws demand immediate attention. * Insufficient testing; lacks crucial error handling and context management. * Improve code clarity through better naming, comprehensive comments, and detailed logging. * Address security vulnerabilities; invest in comprehensive testing to build a robust foundation. * Incorporate context management for improved cancellation and resource cleanup.