Download_Waste_Manager

Code Quality Assessment of `Download_Waste_Manager` **1. Code Quality & Patterns:** The code uses a simple procedural approach with a main loop for file deletion based on age. No design patterns or frameworks are employed. The implementation is straightforward but lacks error handling beyond basic `unwrap()`. **2. Language-Specific Observations:** The code utilizes basic Rust features like `PathBuf`, `SystemTime`, and `Duration` effectively for file system manipulation and time management. However, the extensive use of `unwrap()` makes the code brittle and prone to panics. Missing error handling in the file deletion loop is concerning. **3. Code Structure:** The code is organized in a single file (`src/main.rs`). Naming conventions are reasonably clear. There's a lack of modularity; all logic resides in the `main` function. Separation of concerns is absent. **4. Specific Improvements:** * **Error Handling:** Replace `unwrap()` with proper error handling using `match` or `?` to gracefully handle potential errors (e.g., file not found, permission issues). * **Modularity:** Refactor the code into separate modules for file listing, age checking, and deletion, enhancing readability and maintainability. * **Logging:** Implement proper logging to track successful deletions and errors. * **Configuration:** Move the `waste_folder_path` and `deletion_threshold` to configuration files. * **Testing:** Add unit tests to ensure robustness and aid future modifications. **Impactful Insights:** * **Vulnerable to Panics:** Extensive `unwrap()` calls risk application crashes. * **Missing Error Handling:** Improper error handling limits reliability. * **Poor Modularity:** Lack of modularity hampers maintainability and extensibility. * **Untested Code:** Absence of tests increases risk of bugs and regressions. * **Security Risks:** High security vulnerability score needs immediate attention.